he/him 21 yearsi drawwolf man nuno who likes men that look like girls
47 posts
aemond targaryen has chosen cookie the gingerbread man as his hand.
a Zaunite jayvik au I’m thinking about writing…
Something quick and simple with Feanor and Fingolfin
The arrow is kind of random because I didn't want to give swords to both of them. Don't judge me!
Hey we saw you from across the glade and we really hate your vibe.
Look at this 'morgoth doing a big steppy on fingolfin' cookie
i put this on twitter but it feels like the sort of thing i should subject everyone to
Lady Galadriel, of the golden house of Finarfin, the mightiest and fairest of all elves who remained in the Middle Earth. Lady of Lothlórien and bearer of Nenya. Her hair captured the light of the Trees of Valinor and were so beautiful, that Fëanor asked her for oneand she refused, which made him create the Silmarils.
Later; in third age, she was asked again for a single hair by Gimli and she gave him three.
you guys are so annoying. why do i have to see discourse every year that's like "was tolkien really a woke king or was he your conservative uncle?" the guy was a devout catholic and a genteel misogynist who maintained lifelong friendships with queer people and women, and this isn't even paradoxical because that was part of the upper-class oxford culture he was immersed in. tolkien told the nazis to fuck off (and in doing so demonstrated a real understanding of what racism is and why it's harmful, beyond simply "these guys are bad news because they're who my country is at war with right now") but his inner life was marked by internalized racism that is deeply and inextricably woven into the art that he made. he foolishly described himself as an anarcho-monarchist, and it's kind of crazy to see people on this website passionately arguing that he likely never meaningfully engaged with anarchist theory, because...yeah, no shit, of course he didn't. tolkien didn't have to engage with most sociopolitical theory because as an upper-class englishman of his position, he was never affected by any of the issues that this theory is concerned with. what is plainly obvious from reading both his fiction and letters is that tolkien's ideal political system was that the divinely ordained god-king would rise up and rule in perfect justice and humility; he didn't want a government, he wanted a king arthur, even though (obviously) he was aware that outcome was impossible. why is it so hard for people to accept that he was just some guy! his letters aren't a code you have to crack. no amount of arguing or tumblr-level analysis is going to one day reveal a rhetorically airtight internally consistent worldview spanning jrrt's fiction, academic work, and personal writings, thereby "solving" the question of whether he was a woke king or your conservative uncle. his ideology was extremely inconsistent because, at the end of the day, he was just some guy.
whyd i never post this a